[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Flow through from EMIX comments
ED C’s comments on EMIX WD03 points to several issues that I think belong in EnergyInterop… "If flies are allowed to vote, how meaningful would a poll on what to have for dinner be, and what would be on the menu?" - Unknown
From: Ed Cazalet [mailto:ed@cazalet.com] Some suggested edits and thoughts re our document EMIX wd03 L Here are some use cases that may help. Use Case 1: Most trading: , price, schedule, quantity for offers, bids and transactions Use Case 2: Linked trading, Trading a list of scalar transactions as in Case 1 all in one transaction. This requires all transactions be contracted or none are. Use Case 3: Shaped trades. Price is specified for a set of quantity and interval pairs that form single offer, bid or transaction. It doesn't mean anything to have different prices on elements of such a trade. Use Case 4: List of Scalar trades as in Use Case 1 that can be individually transacted. Price, quantity and interval can be specified for each with other elements of the message the same. Use Case 5: List of Scalar trades for the same interval. This can be the list of current bids and asks in a market. Line 90: The time an offer is made is often important since the price for the same product for the same interval and quantity, location, etc often changes. Should it be an EMIX element? - or is it part of energy interop, for example? Edward G. Cazalet, Ph.D. 101 First Street, Suite 552 Los Altos, CA 94022 650-949-5274 cell: 408-621-2772 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]