energyinterop message

Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (ENERGYINTEROP-56) 640 -Interactions - is it important or worthwhile to note that interactions arealways in a context, and if so, should we say that the parties playdifferent roles in a given context?

From: OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>
To: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:45:22 -0400 (EDT)

640 - Interactions - is it important or worthwhile to note that interactions are always in a context, and if so, should we say that the parties play different roles in a given context?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: ENERGYINTEROP-56
                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-56
             Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: spec
    Affects Versions: wd12
         Environment: SGIP-PAP09 Ed Koch
            Reporter: Toby Considine
            Assignee: Toby Considine


See Party B, and Party C are playing different roles in two different interactions. I look and say presumably, in two different contexts--say two different programs or tariffs. Not necessarily playing dual roles in a single context. Need email thread to discuss.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira