[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [energyinterop] RE: [emix] Prices Absolute, Relative, andProgrammed...
My view is that relative price is still price so belongs in
EMIX. Program level and grid condition indicators are not price.
Do they travel alongside price? I think it is better that these signals
are independent. Consumers should be able to subscribe to the signals
that they’re interested in, having them parse a bucket of info has
several problems: ·
They have to parse much more info than they need. ·
The multiple data sets in the payloads change at different times ·
The structure of the payload will change much more frequently potentially
forcing redeployment of the services Sean From: Bruce Bartell
[mailto:bbartell@xtensible.net] If the only issue is that these requirements are considered totally
DR and hence, EI requirements, then I concur. We will have to make sure they are included in the EI somewhere. I
have not had a chance to look into the items listed in detail and do not expect
to be on today’s call. Can we put this into the EI hopper for next week? Bruce Bartell Xtensible Solutions Mobile: +1.321.258.6500 From: Toby Considine
[mailto:tobyconsidine@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Toby Considine OK – but I need actionable information. Questions (1) 1)
Is this a proposal that EMIX lose the Program level? 2)
Is this a proposal that EMIX lose the relative price? Question (2) So how do we communicate these things that are event
related… 3)
Do we create shadow objects to travel alongside EMIX
that communicate schedules for program information? 4)
Do we create shadow objects to travel alongside EMIX
that communicate schedules for relative price information? For each of the above, we could use WS-Calendar exactly as
EMIX does. It would be straightforward to vote “YES” on all
four. Doing so would push the shadow objects into EI and out of EMIX, which
could be a good thing. We are at the point in these standards where editors need
clean and clear direction… tc "If something is not worth doing, it`s not worth doing
well" - Peter Drucker
From: Girish Ghatikar [mailto:gghatikar@lbl.gov] I second Sean. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Crimmins, Sean <SCrimmins@caiso.com> wrote:
| ||||||||
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]