OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

energyinterop message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [energyinterop] [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ENERGYINTEROP-206) Line 323 and Section 5: EI DR DLC approaches not addressed elsewhere in the document


As a procedural question, sure, composition is the OASIS way.
As a TC question, fine with me, if the TC wishes it.
As an IP question, does the proposal have someone identified, and will those interested in DLC be happy with the IP status of the results.
As a tactical question, 4 guys from this TC (you are already OASIS members) and 4 more form your organizations (they are, too) and two guys who are still members because of oBIX and some guy named Bob that you convince to join could start floating a TC charter tomorrow
As an oBIX guy, I could suggest making an oBIX profiled conversation allowing one to pull it together in a month - in any of those venues.

Which question were you asking? ;->

tc

"If something is not worth doing, it`s not worth doing well" - Peter Drucker

Toby Considine
TC9, Inc
TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar
TC Editor: EMIX, EnergyInterop
U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee

  
Email: Toby.Considine@gmail.com
Phone: (919)619-2104
http://www.tcnine.com/
blog: www.NewDaedalus.com



-----Original Message-----
From: OASIS Issues Tracker [mailto:workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 2:45 PM
To: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [energyinterop] [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ENERGYINTEROP-206) Line 323 and Section 5: EI DR DLC approaches not addressed elsewhere in the document


    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=23684#action_23684 ] 

Bruce Bartell commented on ENERGYINTEROP-206:
---------------------------------------------

Can the deferral be in the form a deferral to another Standards Body? A footnote or section acknowleding that the DLC work is being done elsewhere and EI is deferring to that work?

> Line 323 and Section 5: EI DR DLC approaches not addressed elsewhere 
> in the document
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
>
>                 Key: ENERGYINTEROP-206
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-206
>             Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: spec
>    Affects Versions: wd16
>         Environment: Bruce Bartell wd16 line 323 and section 5
>            Reporter: Bruce Bartell
>            Assignee: Bruce Bartell
>             Fix For: wd18
>
>
> Line 322: "EI also supports demand response approaches ranging from limited direct load control to override-able suggestions to customers."
> Section 5 only has objective based message. Need to add direct load control messages that are sent to Assets.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]