[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ENERGYINTEROP-299) Need betterconsistency in the notion of an ID versus a name (line 892)

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=24950#action_24950 ] 

Bruce Bartell commented on ENERGYINTEROP-299:
---------------------------------------------

Stil and issue in the Opt schema element.
Using eventID instead of DemandResponeEvent.mRID
Using programID insead of DemandResponseProgram.mRID
Using programName instead of DemandResponseProgram.name
Using resoruceID instead of Resource.mRID (mrid is being using in EMIX schema - we at least must have an exact match there)

> Need better consistency in the notion of an ID versus a name (line 892)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ENERGYINTEROP-299
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-299
>             Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Ed Koch 
>            Assignee: William Cox
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Within the EiEvent class, the EiConstaint class, and the EiOptout class there are names and ID attributes. The presumption is that an ID is some sort of object reference and a name is some sort of human readable representation. In some cases such as EiProgram:programID and EiProgram:programName we use both.  It is unclear where a name versus an ID is required and perhaps in some cases where both should be there.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira