[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ENERGYINTEROP-379) Use of "Type"in the naming convention
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=25512#action_25512 ] Gerald Gray commented on ENERGYINTEROP-379: ------------------------------------------- The issue was not clearly reported. While "typing" is appropriate per the NIEM NDR, what is of interest is where we see "TypeType" in the schema, where a "Type" is "Typed". What may be useful is to use the work "Kind" when indicating a category of a particular thing. > Use of "Type" in the naming convention > -------------------------------------- > > Key: ENERGYINTEROP-379 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-379 > Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: schema > Affects Versions: wd22 > Environment: Gerald Gray > Reporter: Gerald Gray > Assignee: William Cox > > Ei Enroll - In some places the "Type" suffix appears to make sense, e.g. ResourceGenerationType where perhaps a distinction is being made among different types of resources, however, in some places it is somewhat confusing e.g. ResourceTypeType. (Would this indicate where an enum would be used?) > Is there a naming convention here to distinguish complex types in the schema with the "type" suffix? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]