OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

energyinterop message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ENERGYINTEROP-429) wd23:incorrect glossary entry reference to EMIX



    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=26308#action_26308 ] 

Toby Considine commented on ENERGYINTEROP-429:
----------------------------------------------

This is one of the more critical issues in the current Spec. DIfferent partie want to define Resources for *Radically* different purposes w/o taking the trouble to define a consensus view. Accordinngly, we have a muddle here that could substantially limit interoperation between implimentations,

Deferring this for discussion during the PR and at the F2F in Montreal

> wd23: incorrect glossary entry reference to EMIX
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ENERGYINTEROP-429
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-429
>             Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: spec
>    Affects Versions: wd24
>         Environment: Anne Hendry
>            Reporter: Anne Hendry 
>            Assignee: Toby Considine
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Line 1454 - 1456 states:
> "Resource (as defined in EMIX): A Resource is something that can describe its capabilities in a Tender
> 1455 into a market. How those Capabilities vary over time is defined by application of the Capability
> 1456 Description to a WS-Calendar Sequence. See [EMIX]."
> EMIX has no such definition for 'Resource'.  Rather it has many mentions of various characteristics under various circumstances in many different places in the specification, but no definition.
> Resource is already defined for Energy Interop.  It doesn't make sense to have two definitions in one spec for the same term, one from the spec itself and then another differing one from different spec.   Otherwise you'd need to specify each time you used the term which one you were using.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]