[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [energyinterop] Motion for Electronic Ballot - More details
Thanks, Toby. The ballot has been opened. Voting members (see the
Roster) have received mail Friday from "workgroup mailer" and will
get reminders to vote. NOTE THAT IF YOU FILTER ON [energyinterop] IN THE SUBJECT LINE that this does not have that text, so look in your unfiltered email. All reminder notices will be in the same format. THIS IS A PROCEDURAL BALLOT - the changes are below. This is ONLY to remove the copy of the EMIX schemas from the public review package, with no change to the spec or the schemas other than the minimum to do that. This is an inline update to the EI PR02/CSD02 in process - this is still PR02, and we still plan on PR03... For where the ballot question text came from, see motion 4 on July 6: The second to last sentence, in bold, is what we're accomplishing with this electronic ballot, should it pass. The URI and "25" in bold were updated to the correct package URI and "26". Motion 5 was I changed the parts in bold in motion 4, and changed the voice in both to "should the TC..." Thanks! bill -- William Cox
Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax On 7/8/11 10:51 PM, Considine, Toby (Campus Services IT) wrote: 7n3raomhu7xthulyqpp1pfw4.1310179872456@email.android.com" type="cite">I think we should go ahead Its the fastest way to get the result we voted for, and the faster we start the poll, the faster it finishes. I have verified the EMIX artifacts and verified the EU artifacts when referring to them Girish Ghatikar <gghatikar@lbl.gov> wrote: |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]