[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [energyinterop] Feedback proposals and questions
I don’t want to be too presumptuous as to what Bill is doing, but I believe that yes the calendar object that has the attached values is part of the feedback message just like baselines and DR signals are. From: Gerald Gray [mailto:gerald.gray@guiding-principle.com] Hi Ed, I like what you have hear Ed. I your proposed change to the service operation patterns, are we assuming then that the calendar info is/would come back on any feedback request so we don’t need a separate interaction just to get schedules? If so, then I agree with this change. cell: 517.455.4824| fax: 517.913.6024 From: Koch, Edward [mailto:Edward.Koch@Honeywell.com] Enclosed is a document that we can use as in our meeting tomorrow morning to discuss Feedback. Bill and I split up the work. He is working on the calendaring mechanisms for attaching feedback values and I am working on the feedback attributes and interaction patterns. Enclosed is a document with my proposed changes and questions for the group. In general I did the following: - Enumerated some working assumptions and overall requirements - Made a minor refactor to group together attributes of a like nature for better readability. - Added a couple of new attributes - Created a datatype that can be used to instantiate values and attach to calendar objects. - Proposed some changes to the operations and their interaction patterns. - Added more documentation to existing attributes The enclosed document illustrates those changes and poses some open questions that we can discuss in our meeting tomorrow. Thanks, -ed Koch |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]