[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ENERGYINTEROP-524) Continuity ofTransaction
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=27839#action_27839 ] Edward Cazalet commented on ENERGYINTEROP-524: ----------------------------------------------- Toby I am not certain of the context of this issue. Is the comment focused on VEN/VTN Services or Transactive Services? For Transactive Services we have the following cases: A) Tender, Transaction, and Delivery B) This is an EMIX Option with the Option Price providing the discount for standing by to be called N times per Year c) This is an EMIX Option In the case of VTN/VEN I don't understand the comment. > Continuity of Transaction > ------------------------- > > Key: ENERGYINTEROP-524 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-524 > Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: schema > Environment: Toby Considine > Reporter: Toby Considine > Assignee: William Cox > > There are three sorts of interactions > A) One time tender-bid-execution > B) I get a discount all the time because I can get called for n events per year > C) I have a specific option for specific availability for a specific time > In B and C there is a continuity of contract and transaction that does not appear to be adeqautely represented in the current payloads. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]