[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ENERGYINTEROP-629) 475 - statement that there are no direct interactions across the ESI does not seem to be enforced in EI.

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=28573#action_28573 ] 

Edward Cazalet  commented on ENERGYINTEROP-629:
-----------------------------------------------

Agree.  But to clarify, a Party acting in a Transactive Role can be place as the ESI as an alternative to a VEN.

> 475 - statement that there are no direct interactions across the ESI does not seem to be enforced in EI.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ENERGYINTEROP-629
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-629
>             Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: spec
>    Affects Versions: wd33
>            Reporter: Edward Cazalet 
>            Assignee: Toby Considine
>             Fix For: wd34
>
>
> 475  It would seem that the assumption of no direct interaction across the ESI is not enforced in EI as multiple Resources inside the ESI are exposed to the grid  side of the ESI
> If the customer side of the interface is managed using the VEN/VTN approach wherein the ESI is a VEN that does not expose any VTNs inside the ESI VEN then we can still observe 475.  
> 1238  Do all VENs have an ESI?  For example does an aggregator acting as a VEN to an ISO have an ESI?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira