RE: [energyinterop] WSDL version question

As a question, was WS-I B 2.0 developed before or after 2.0? An request to use 1.1 could be a “don’t use that bug-ridden 1.0” or it could be “stay away from the mistakes of 2.0” or it could be “use the one that is current as of this pub date”

As a related note, the TAB in OASIS is examining specs to find cross-dependencies, and considering a means for recommended updates as standards advance.

"It is the theory that decides what can be observed." - Albert Einstein

Toby Considine

Chair, OASIS oBIX Technical Committee
U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee

Facilities Technology Office
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC

Email: Toby.Considine@ unc.edu
Phone: (919)962-9073

http://www.oasis-open.org

blog: www.NewDaedalus.com

From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Pim van der Eijk
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 9:54 AM
To: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [energyinterop] WSDL version question

Hello,

Energy Interop wd 36 recommends conformance to WS-I Basic Profile 2.0. The WSDL version supported by the WS-I BP 2.0 (and by 1.2) is WSDL 1.1.

The WSDL documents in wd 36 use the http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl namespace which is the namespace of version 2.0 of WSDL rather than the WSDL 1.1 namespace, http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/.

Would it not make sense to deliver WSDLs in the interoperable version covered by the WS-I profile that the EI specification references?

Pim

energyinterop message