[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [energyinterop] WSDL version question
I have no objection, we went with 2.0 because it supports REST as well. "It is the theory that decides what can be observed." - Albert Einstein
From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Pim van der Eijk The "final material" version of BP 2.0 is dated November 2010, WSDL 2.0 is a W3C recommendation since June 2007. I think BP still uses the WSDL 1.1 because WSDL 2.0 has not (at least, not yet) gained much adoption. Most tools only support WSDL 1.1. Pim From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Considine, Toby (Campus Services IT) As a question, was WS-I B 2.0 developed before or after 2.0? An request to use 1.1 could be a “don’t use that bug-ridden 1.0” or it could be “stay away from the mistakes of 2.0” or it could be “use the one that is current as of this pub date” As a related note, the TAB in OASIS is examining specs to find cross-dependencies, and considering a means for recommended updates as standards advance. tc "It is the theory that decides what can be observed." - Albert Einstein
From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Pim van der Eijk Hello, Energy Interop wd 36 recommends conformance to WS-I Basic Profile 2.0. The WSDL version supported by the WS-I BP 2.0 (and by 1.2) is WSDL 1.1. The WSDL documents in wd 36 use the http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl namespace which is the namespace of version 2.0 of WSDL rather than the WSDL 1.1 namespace, http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/. Would it not make sense to deliver WSDLs in the interoperable version covered by the WS-I profile that the EI specification references? Pim |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]