energyinterop message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [energyinterop] Groups - Transport Protocol Bindings for OASIS Energy Interoperation 1.0 Version 1.0 uploaded
- From: "Pim van der Eijk" <pvde@sonnenglanz.net>
- To: <energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:35:33 +0100
In the meeting we mentioned that it would be useful if
the table in section 2.2.2.3 of this document would be in the EI main
specification document. The transport binding document could then just reference
this and be simpler.
Some comments on WD16 that relate to
this:
In writing the document, I noticed that the summary
tables often have the same role names ("Party", "Party") but the activity
diagrams use different roles ("Party", "CounterParty"). It might be
clearer to have distinct roles in the summary tables that match the values in
the activity diagram. (Other standards, such as UBL, do this in a
similar way). If messages can go in either direction, the table should
have a two rows for the two situations.
The activity diagram in 7.5.1.1 has "Party" in both
swimlanes, this could be changed to "Party", "CounterParty" as in the
other diagrams for consistency.
In section 9, event services, table 9-1 (page 96 of the
PDF document) does not have all the details of the activity diagrams. For
example, in figure 9-6 there are two "EiCreatedEvent" messages
(the second of which is optional) that are not preceded by an
"EiCreateEvent" message. This is unexpected as the table only describes
the EICreatedEvent as a response to an EiCreateEvent
message.
Would it be clearer to rename the second
"EiCreatedEvent()" message to something like "EiOptOutEvent()" to show the
different purpose of this second message?
In
figure 9-7, there is a typo "EiReplytPendingEvent" -->
"EiReplyPendingEvent".
Apologies if any of the above have already been discussed in the
TC.
Pim
Submitter's message
Here is a first draft for a TPB
document. Comments and feedback welcome.
I cannot attend next week's
call due to travel, but am available on calls later this month or in December to
discuss this further.
Pim
-- Mr. Pim van der Eijk
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]