Re: [energyinterop] Notes on WD08 draft AND Work in progress on WD09 + P

Toby -

Thanks for the detailed comments. I've incorporated most of them in WD09 - WIP (Work in Progress). I'm sending this (and a diffmarked copy wrt WD08) to the list rather than clutter the repository with transitory versions.

See attached as DOCX - Word Comments and Edits are fine.

Thanks!

bill

On 8/11/21 10:59 AM, Considine, Toby wrote:

Comments on WD08

Consider moving one-sentence paragrapg 217-219 to be the topic [first] sentence of paragraph 213-216.

Done

Line 246. Consider replacing "have been unique systems" with "have not been interoperable"

Done.

Consider replacing all of section 1.63 and associated subsections with:

WS-Calendar expresses events and sequences to support machine-to-machine (M2M) negotiation of schedules while being semantically compatible with human schedules, i.e., [iCalendar]. The TC produced schemas to support messages that are nearly identical to those used in human schedules, a more abstract Platform Independent Model (PIM) and a compact _expression_, [Streams], to support remote telemetry and projections.

WS-Calendar conveys domain specific information in a per-event payload. An essential concept of WS-Calendar is inheritance, by which a starting time can be applied to an existing message, or by which all events in a sequence can be start with the same payload. Inheritance is used to “complete” a partial message during negotiation. CTS makes use of this to apply common market product across a sequence, or to convey a specific starting time to a market product.

CTS messages conform to the Streams format.

Done with some rewrite

484: DO we want to reference that Resources, as defined in EMIX, are extensible?

Reworded so CTS 1.0 uses the CTS definition, and referenced extension via standard object

487 [Table] Consider noting that while this specification may refer to a Matching Engine, the structure and algorithms of the matching engine are out of scope.

Done

Bravo on Paragraph at 515

:-)

522: "Facets defined in CTS"

Done

522: Why not EiQuote??????

Added text to last line of table 2-2.

588: green Warrant. Capitalize both or neither.

Both, and made Italic rather than quoted.

Footnote 8: "more efficent than"

Done. Now Footnote 7

Notable EI Interaction left out: Failure to Deliver.
Transaction 47 - I ordered 10 kW of power and I was only able to take delivery of 7 kW.

Leaving this alone right now per discussion in August 12 meeting.

The note is ambiguous - which Actor decides? Not available, or can't accept the full committed amount? Seems like an area that needs discussion.

William Cox

Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com

Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com

+1 862 485 3696 mobile

energyinterop message