[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (ENERGYINTEROP-730) Transactive State
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Toby Considine updated ENERGYINTEROP-730: ----------------------------------------- Environment: Horia Pop; Lateral Inc https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202112/msg00001.html (was: [https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202112/msg00001.html]ÂHoria Pop; Lateral Inc) > Transactive State > ----------------- > > Key: ENERGYINTEROP-730 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-730 > Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: cts > Affects Versions: CTSPR01 > Environment: Horia Pop; Lateral Inc https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202112/msg00001.html > Reporter: Toby Considine > Assignee: Toby Considine > Priority: Major > Labels: ARCH-CONF > > *Transactive State* > Transactive state values are not documented in CTS nor [EMIX]. While one can imply the meaning, the boundaries of each state seem vague when analyzed. Is there an implied order too? What state would a delivered and settled tender take? Delivery or publication?Ã What about in a market where settlement occurs at the time of the transaction before delivery? > Having the same transactive state map over both tenders and transaction is a stretch when taking the individual values.Ã This dual-use also becomes a source of conflictual information and implementations intent between a tender transactive state and the transaction transactive state. > _[Lines 555, 599]_ -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.3#803004)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]