[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (ENERGYINTEROP-673) Bias in Matching Algorithm
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=80649#comment-80649 ] William Cox commented on ENERGYINTEROP-673: ------------------------------------------- Actor conversation needs to be done clearly and once. (Introductory chapter needs improvement) "Market" acts as a party; bilateral transactions against that market party seems fundamental. > Bias in Matching Algorithm > -------------------------- > > Key: ENERGYINTEROP-673 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-673 > Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: cts > Affects Versions: CTSPR01 > Environment: Trevor Hardy, PNNL https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202111/msg00000.html > Reporter: Toby Considine > Assignee: William Cox > Priority: Critical > Labels: CLARITY, MARKET > > page 16 line 261-262 > It has already been stated that CTS does not prescribe the nature of the matching engine but doesn't the definition of part and counter-party at least strongly imply some kind of matched bi-lateral trade? Double-auctions can artificially create the appearance of bi-lateral trades after the clearing price and quantity have been established but it would be a layer of artifice. For the concept of "party" and "counter-party" to be an integral part of CTS seems to heavily lean towards bi-lateral matching engines. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.3#803004)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]