[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (ENERGYINTEROP-669) FSGIM Streams Compatibility
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=80704#comment-80704 ] William Cox commented on ENERGYINTEROP-669: ------------------------------------------- For consideration, the proposed text needs to be contributed to the Energy Interoperation Technical Committee. The simplest way is to email the relevant document(s) to energyinterop-comment@lists.oasis-open.org after subscribing to that list. The Streams-related classes in the 2016 FSGIM model do not appear different from the WS-Calendar standard. There are no links provided, and locating "FSGIM User Guide" has not succeeded. We request that the commenter identify and provide relevant documents. > FSGIM Streams Compatibility > --------------------------- > > Key: ENERGYINTEROP-669 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-669 > Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: cts > Affects Versions: CTSPR01 > Environment: Steve Ray https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202111/msg00005.html > Reporter: Toby Considine > Assignee: Toby Considine > Priority: Minor > Labels: ARCH-CONF > > Sections 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 (beginning at line 158) discuss conformance with WS-Calendar Streams and with FSGIM. It should be noted that FSGIM extended the idea of Streams beyond just a sequence of identical, contiguous intervals (as documented in the FSGIM User Guide, beginning at page 221). I would recommend that the CTS committee consider this more general specification, which supports the notion of Streams as well as other, less periodic sequences. > Steve Ray -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.3#803004)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]