OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

energyinterop message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (ENERGYINTEROP-697) Conformance with WS-Calendar


    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=80707#comment-80707 ] 

William Cox commented on ENERGYINTEROP-697:
-------------------------------------------

Line 782 reference in CTSPR01 should in fact reference the evolved and simplified WS-Calendar-Min (reference is [CAL-MIN]) rather than the predecessor [WS-Calendar] as quoted in the comment. [CAL-MIN] has no requirement on zero-duration intervals.

We are referring the conformance question to the WS-Calendar maintainers.

The wording should indicate to which specification conformance is claimed; the text is not clear. Correct to reference CAL-MIN and to better describe the relationship of EI to WS-Calendar and the present relationship of CTS to CAL-MIN and Streams.

Extend discussion to show what is meant by conformance (in the sense of IEC 62746-10-3) and extension where there is extension.

> Conformance with WS-Calendar
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: ENERGYINTEROP-697
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-697
>             Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: cts
>    Affects Versions: CTSPR01
>         Environment: H Walter JohnsonÂhttps://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202111/msg00007.html 
>            Reporter: Toby Considine
>            Assignee: William Cox
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ARCH-CONF
>
> When discussing Conformance (Section 14), line 780 says Portions of CTS conform to and use updated and simplified versions of the specifications. I guess it's possible for a spec's conformance rules to allow the CTS spec to both conform to it and to extend it, but it does sound somewhat paradoxical. Besides, the WS-Calendar spec says [lines 1553-1554] that "Specifications that...claim conformance with WS-Calendar SHALL define the business meaning of zero duration Intervals and I don't find that in the CTS spec.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.3#803004)


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]