[OASIS Issue Tracker] (ENERGYINTEROP-710) Minimal and Fractal

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=81085#comment-81085 ] 

William Cox commented on ENERGYINTEROP-710:
-------------------------------------------

"6. Section 1.6: Iâm awaiting the novel value of this âminimal transactive profile.â If valuable, why are the referenced standards not being extended instead of creating a separate CTS standard? "

Not certain this claim is in the revised text as of WD16. CTS profiles Energy Interoperation, uses terms consistent with financial markets for extended use, and includes extensions for Position and Marketplace as well as clarifying and extending Market Characteristics.

A goal is firmware TE participants that can interoperate with any market.

> Minimal and Fractal
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: ENERGYINTEROP-710
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-710
>             Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: cts
>    Affects Versions: CTSPR01
>         Environment: Donald Hammerstrom https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202111/msg00008/2111DJH_CTS_Review.pdf
>            Reporter: Toby Considine
>            Assignee: William Cox
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ARCH-CONF
>
> There are 30 specific recommendations in the "Specific Recommendations" section of the submitted Hammerstrom paper. I have numbered them all for traceability as I recombine them into specific issues. The original white paper/submission can be read in the URI under "environment"
> 6. Section 1.6: Iâm awaiting the novel value of this âminimal transactive profile.â If valuable, why are the referenced standards not being extended instead of creating a separate CTS standard?Â
> 7. Section 2.1.1: This claim of hierarchical or âfractalâ application of CTS is questionable. It seems that CTS provides means of procuring needed and selling surplus energies in time, but it does not aggregate the opportunities that could be embedded in an aggregate supply or demand curve. It is unlikely that dissimilar aggregated devices or prioritizable actor preferences can be combined at the same identical strike price.Â
> 10. Section 2.2.1: This treatment of âfacetsâ seems to be a step backward and is not architecturally sound. The âfacetsâ are first introduced as properties of interactions and later as Actor roles. These are certainly not actor roles and do not inherently even belong to Actors. What an odd mix! (Maybe these are âinteraction profilesâ?)Â
> Â



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.3#803004)