[OASIS Issue Tracker] (ENERGYINTEROP-697) Conformance with WS-Calendar

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

William Cox updated ENERGYINTEROP-697:
--------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: ctsWD17
       Resolution: 
Corrected reference to show CAL-MIN not [WS-Calendar] 

A future draft will add an Informative Appendix to describe conformance with the TEMIX profile of Energy Interoperation (using the methods of IEC 62746-10-3)

         Assignee: William Cox  (was: Toby Considine)

> Conformance with WS-Calendar
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: ENERGYINTEROP-697
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-697
>             Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: cts
>    Affects Versions: CTSPR01
>         Environment: H Walter JohnsonÂhttps://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202111/msg00007.html 
>            Reporter: Toby Considine
>            Assignee: William Cox
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: ARCH-CONF
>             Fix For: ctsWD17
>
>
> When discussing Conformance (Section 14), line 780 says Portions of CTS conform to and use updated and simplified versions of the specifications. I guess it's possible for a spec's conformance rules to allow the CTS spec to both conform to it and to extend it, but it does sound somewhat paradoxical. Besides, the WS-Calendar spec says [lines 1553-1554] that "Specifications that...claim conformance with WS-Calendar SHALL define the business meaning of zero duration Intervals and I don't find that in the CTS spec.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.3#803004)