[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: No Subject
[ I sent this a few days ago, but accidentally sent my reply to Norman alone ... ] On 17/11/2000 17:20:55 Norman Walsh wrote: >It seems likely that not-to-distant XML systems will have no remains >of DTD syntax at all. We need to provide a little more support for >those systems. > [ ... ] > SYSTEM > PUBLIC > NAMESPACE > SCHEMALOC > STYLESHEET > INCLUDE I agree with Norman that it is important to plan for life after DTDs, even if rumours of the death of DTDs may have been greatly exaggerated. My question though is whether we will be well enough served by any set of 1-1 mappings. Is it reasonable to aim for 1-N mappings, so that if you have NAMESPACE defined you can ask xmlcat to give you the matching array [ NAMESPACE, SCHEMALOC, STYLESHEET, INCLUDE ] ? In particular, I am thinking here that you could have entries in that array that do not have keywords defined to name them, but which are of importance to the end user. Cheers, Tony. ======== Anthony B. Coates Leader of XML Architecture & Design Chief Technology Office Reuters Plc, London. tony.coates@reuters.com ======== ----------------------------------------------------------------- Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC