[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Proposal for XML syntax for catalogs
/ Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com> was heard to say: | TR9401 says: | The BASE keyword specifies that relative storage object identifiers (SOIs) | in the right hand side of entries following this entry in the current | catalog entry file should be resolved relative to the storage object | identifier of this BASE entry. | | That would apply equally to the SOI in CATALOG and DELEGATE entries. | Therefore, I assume we plan to do likewise. Using Norm's example, That's what I intended. In the draft I will post shortly, anything with an attribute type identified as "uriReference" would be effected by xml:base. | I'd also point out that, though Norm's example used a value of "absURI" | for xml:base, the value of xml:base needn't be an absolute URI. Right. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@East.Sun.COM | The present moment is a powerful XML Technology Center | goddess.--Goethe Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC