[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: URNs approved by Karl
On 01/05/2001 20:37:59 Norman Walsh wrote: >Versioning is open issue #26. The namespace name is one way to do it, but >it's fairly coarse. It means that 1.0 processors will be completely >unable to recognize 1.1 catalog documents. I think I prefer a required >version attribute on the catalog element. Then we can say that version 1.0 >processors are allowed to ignore elements that they don't recognize when >processing version 1.0+delta catalogs. At the risk of overkill, I'm inclined to require both a versioned namespace and a version attribute on the root element. I know it leaves scope for inconsistent versioning, but I think that can simply be specified as an error condition. Cheers, Tony. ======== Anthony B. Coates Leader of XML Architecture & Design Chief Technology Office Reuters Plc, London. tony.coates@reuters.com ======== ----------------------------------------------------------------- Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC