entity-resolution message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: Re: What John thinks: public id to URN mapping

From: Lauren Wood <lauren@softquad.com>
To: entity-resolution@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 10:06:03 -0700

John Cowan wrote:

> Paul Grosso wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> I agree with all the simplification including not bothering to
>> make the leading + a special case.
> 
> 
> Looks like we have consensus, then.  + is always magic.

Looks good to me as well. Special cases are always tricky.

Another issue off the list!

Lauren

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What John thinks: public id to URN mapping
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

References:
- What John thinks: public id to URN mapping
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Re: What John thinks: public id to URN mapping
  - From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Re: What John thinks: public id to URN mapping
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC