[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Unwrapping urn:public:...
On 08/05/2001 13:34:01 Norman Walsh wrote: >That's an even greater extension and I think it's going to far. > >Right now: > > urn:publicid:* would match "urn:publicid:*" > >The proposal, as I understand it, is that we should allow > > urn:publicid:-:* to match "-//*" > >I think going the last step and allowing > > -//* to match "urn:publicid:-:*" > >is adding unnecessary confusion for users and burden for implementors. Quite the opposite. The unnecessary confusion for users is that you only want to support the "urn:publicid:..." form to match both kinds of FPI. And, when the poor sods ask why, they will be told that it was to reduce it was to reduce the burden on the poor implementors. I couldn't sell that excuse, could anyone? Cheers, Tony. ======== Anthony B. Coates Leader of XML Architecture & Design Chief Technology Office Reuters Plc, London. tony.coates@reuters.com ======== ----------------------------------------------------------------- Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC