[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: problem with the spec
On 1 Aug 2001, Norman Walsh wrote: > / Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com> was heard to say: > | Despite my earlier yes vote, Rob Lugt has just raised an issue [1] > | that now has me changing my vote to NO. > > Formally, I suppose I must do the same. I vote NO. > > | I would like us to change the spec to use the longest rewrite entry > | in the current catalog entry file. Norm has said he will plan to > > I've already made the change on the assumption that it will be > uncontroversial. > > | make that change to the draft. Then I'd like to ask that we have > | our telcon this coming Monday where we can vote on the new draft > | in real time. I hereby make this suggestion to the chair. > > Seconded. I'll post a revised draft today. The chair agrees with this notion and thereby calls a meeting for next Monday to finalise the specification. Any objections to making this change should be raised in email before the Monday meeting. Lauren
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC