RE: [entity-resolution] Dealing with recent comments

[Tony Coates <Tony.Coates@reuters.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lauren Wood [mailto:lauren@textuality.com] 

> Which doesn't mean to say that we can't start discussing the 
> issues now, and have them basically resolved in email before the phone
call. 
> Which one do we want to start with - the FPI request, or the "catalog
DTD" email?

How about the FPI?  Mark suggested something like

     -//OASIS//DTD Entity Resolution XML Catalog V1.0//EN
 or
     -//OASIS//DTD XML Catalog V1.0//EN

I have two issues with these:

1. I would prefer "+//IDN oasis-open.org//..." to "-//OASIS//..." (but
am interested to hear discussion on that).

2. The spec doesn't require catalog(ue)s to adhere to the DTD, but
nonetheless a lot of catalogs will probably be valid with respect to the
DTD.  So, I wouldn't want the FPI to label it as "the DTD", but I could
certainly live with it being labelled as "the strict DTD", in the same
sense as HTML Strict.

Do people agree/disagree with these thoughts?

	Cheers,
		Tony.
========
Anthony B. Coates
XML & Search Architect
Chief Technology Office
Reuters Plc, London.
Tony.Coates@reuters.com
========


-------------------------------------------------------------- --
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.