[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [entity-resolution] Spec comments to process
At 23:05 2003 08 20 +0100, Anthony B. Coates wrote: >** Reply to message from Normand_Montour@lgs.com on Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:28:38 >-0400 > >> Norm, >> about point no. 2 in the technical area (schema): My thoughts would be >> that >> at least the DTD and the W3C Schema should be normative, but not exclusive >> of any other one... > >That said, if XCatalogs relied on RELAX NG, I wouldn't be able to deploy them >on any project I work on. Also, as I remember, we decided that schemata of any >form were not necessary for XCatalogs, just useful for some users. In that >case, I would suggest doing DTD and XML Schema and RELAX NG, *none* of which >are normative. Any takers? I think I tend to agree. The prose should be normative. I'm not sure I see the point of making any of the schema normative. paul
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]