[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [entity-resolution] Spec comments to process
On 21 Aug 2003 Paul Grosso wrote: > At 23:05 2003 08 20 +0100, Anthony B. Coates wrote: > >** Reply to message from Normand_Montour@lgs.com on Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:28:38 > >-0400 > > > >> Norm, > >> about point no. 2 in the technical area (schema): My thoughts would be > >> that > >> at least the DTD and the W3C Schema should be normative, but not exclusive > >> of any other one... > > > >That said, if XCatalogs relied on RELAX NG, I wouldn't be able to deploy them > >on any project I work on. Also, as I remember, we decided that schemata of any > >form were not necessary for XCatalogs, just useful for some users. In that > >case, I would suggest doing DTD and XML Schema and RELAX NG, *none* of which > >are normative. Any takers? > > > I think I tend to agree. The prose should be normative. > I'm not sure I see the point of making any of the schema > normative. I agree as well. In fact, this was issue one in our issues document, that was decided way back in 2001. See http://www.oasis- open.org/committees/entity/issues.html. Unless someone has a good reason to reopen this discussion, I propose we not. Lauren
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]