[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [entity-resolution] minutes from ER TC phone call 20050215
> From: Lauren Wood [mailto:lauren@textuality.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 16 February, 2005 13:33 > To: entity-resolution@lists.oasis-open.org; Paul Grosso > Subject: RE: [entity-resolution] minutes from ER TC phone > call 20050215 > > On 16 Feb 2005 Paul Grosso wrote: > > I'm confused. > > > > Are we certifying that we are using the Committee Draft > > or the Committee Specification (which doesn't yet exist)? > > Committee Specification is a term that OASIS no longer uses; I understood it was only shortly gone but now coming back (it was stupid ever to have removed it). > the > product of the TC if it doesn't go to OASIS Standard is the Committee > Draft. > > > I'm assuming that we are certifying that we are using the CD, > > and that the point of this is to get to CS. But then I'm > > wondering where the CD is that I'm certifying we're using. > > The last published document I find on our TC page is a 1.0 > > from over a year ago. > > Norm will be publishing the CD that we voted on on Tuesday as soon as > he has fixed the small mistakes that Tony pointed out, and reverted > to "id" as the ID attribute name. This is the CD that people should > certify their companies are using. I'd like us to double check things. I do not believe we need to certify that we're using a CD. A CD is just put out for public review and needs no certification. I may be confused with the changing status of names in OASIS, but this does not match what we're doing in the DITA TC, for example. paul > Note that "using" does not > necessarily imply "using every part of", so given that the CD 1.1 is > a superset of 1.0, using the 1.0 features of 1.1 is sufficient for > this certification. > > Does that help? > > Lauren >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]