[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Public review comments for etmf-v1.0-csprd01: 5 Content Classification System
Comment type [editorial] Impact [minor] “….for a specific domain (e.g., eTMF)”. The specification concerns only one domain, namely eTMF. Therefore “e.g.” is not an appropriate term in this context. Suggestion: “for a specific domain (i.e., eTMF)” Eldin Rammell. Principal Consultant, Rammell Consulting Ltd |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]