OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

etmf-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Draft Specification Comments: Section 6 Web Standard Technology Core


Section 6.1 "Per FDA part 11 compliance..."
I am not aware of any export formats required by 21 CFR 11. Suggest striking this phrase.

Section 6.2 "However, the signing party cannot be easily verified"
This is too subjective a statement and should be removed, or added to to qualify under what conditions an electronic signature's signing party cannot be easily verified. If this is true, why does FDA accept them per 21 CFR 11?

Section 6.2 "RSA or Elliptic Curve"
Are these terms defined or given a reference anywhere in the specification? If not they should be.

Section 6.3 "...Source, Digital Signature, and Date"
Digital signature only? Or should this be Electronic Signature? If digital only, why does the BPM metadata not support electronic signatures?

--

Todd Tullis

Senior Product Manager - Vault eTMF

Veeva Systems

415-577-3181 mobile

todd.tullis@veeva.com



Save the date for the Veeva R&D Summit October 21-22, 2014


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]