RE: [fwsi-comment] Public Comment

["Tan Puay Siew" <pstan@SIMTech.a-star.edu.sg>]

Hi Brian
Sorry for not replying earlier, due to some miscomm.

We are looking into this, and will reply to this soon.

Thank you very much for your support on this. Hope to hear more from you
soon

Regards
-ps-

-----Original Message-----
From: comment-form@oasis-open.org [mailto:comment-form@oasis-open.org] 
Sent: Thursday, 23 February, 2006 3:08 AM
To: fwsi-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [fwsi-comment] Public Comment


Comment from: bcarroll@serena.com

Name: Brian R. Carroll

Title: Serena Fellow

Organization: Seena Software

Regarding Specification: Functional Elements Specification, Committee
Draft 2.0



In section 2.5 Identity Management Functional Element, a choice of the
SAML protocols (SAML Request and SAML Response) seems to have been made.

While that is one viable option, the specification should also consider
the use of WS-Trust.

Ideally the two specs would converge, but in the meantime, the FWSI work
would be more useful and applicable if it acknowledged the fact that two
viable alternatives to perfrom the same functions existed.





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fwsi-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fwsi-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org