[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [geolang-comment] Scripts, charsets, media types? (was: Quo vadis,GeoLang?)
Lars Marius Garshol wrote: > I think they are in scope, the question is really if they are > important enough to warrant inclusion. I think: if (important) include(); else if (!important && !difficult) include(); else exclude(); These sets are not difficult: they don't have very many associated facts, and they are as you say in scope, at least marginally. > This one I think is outside scope, however. It's not geography, nor is > it linguistic. Both of the above are linguistic, or at least clearly > related to linguistic information. > > The problem is that it would probably be a quite useful PSI set. I'm > not sure what to do about that. Umm, redefine our scope? Of course we don't have to do so quite yet. -- John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> http://www.reutershealth.com I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC