[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [geolang-comment] First proposals for ISO 639 and 3166 available
Steve Pepper scripsit: > (2) One that declares the "language" and "language group/collection" > topics and otherwise consists of a set of class-instance associations > between the topics declared in (1) and the classes to which 639 > (rightly or wrongly) asserts that they belong (let's call this one > 639-classes.xtm). +1 for the reasons given > Actually, the same line of argument (ease of use, the ability to get > at just those parts of the formal representation that are actually needed > for a particular application) could be used to justify splitting > 639-basic.xtm into multiple topic maps. -1 -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC