[humanmarkup-comment] RE: HM.frameworks: social structure for thegiven context

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

An attribute is only one way.  It is more likely given 
the draft Schema it would be a subclass of one of the 
abstract types.   We got to an early stopping place 
with the draft schema, asked for comments, and got none. 
This is something that would be enormously helpful if 
tedious:  for application designers (folks like yourself) 
to take that schema and see if you can work up a social 
structure context with it that works for you.  The 
draft was created as a toolbox.  So far, no one has 
tried to use it and for that reason, it sits unmodifed 
and unimproved.  I know lots of ways to extend it, 
but I won't until we get real feedback from real 
users because otherwise, it will turn into something 
specific to my own applications and that is the wrong 
way to go about this.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Balachandhran [mailto:balloo@vsnl.com]

That article was especially useful to put the whole thing in the right
context.
Now pondering on that brings up the question of defining the socail
structure framework for a given context (which can be an attribute in XML
terms, I guess).