RE: [humanmarkup-comment] HN.requirements Chat Transcript

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

Title: HN.requirements Chat Transcript

Can we consider the use of RELAX NG for a peer to the XML Schema in the base?

As the threads on XML-Dev are revealing, there may be some technical issues

for a base/secondary design that will be hard for RELAX NG, but we may gain a

design that is much easier for our target users to learn and apply.

 

A very complicated HumanML won't do.   One that is too simplistic won't either.

I think we understand the domains that the base should represent in that our

research has illuminated the most useful classifications for characteristics

of human communication, but we have to assemble these in a way that the

developers of the secondary languages that are really the primary application

languages, can create also easily usable languages.  Markup isn't a goal

in and of itself for us.  The illumination of human communication is, IMO.

 

len