RE: [humanmarkup-comment] Base Schema-haptic

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

I forgot to add that the math for matching and mapping patterns is 
most likely going to come from Wolfram's work, but I wouldn't want to 
bog anyone down right now, except Sylvia, with the suggestion that 
they have the Wolfram book to hand while going through Gudwin's work. 
Rob's already done it and I'm slogging through it in parallel with 
the process of examining the elements in the Base Schema.

When I think about how these apparently separate studies that have 
each been assiduously worked on over the last twenty years, actually 
work together I am put in mind of the Grateful Dead song, "What a 
long strange trip, it's been."

I still second the suggestion.

Ciao,
Rex

At 11:08 AM -0500 8/23/02, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>Everyone might want to glance over this over
>the weekend.
>
>http://www.dca.fee.unicamp.br/~gudwin/compsemio/
>
>Don't get too lost in Gudwin's terminology, but
>the models are sound.  Professor's and department
>heads are entangled in the processes of education
>and funding, publishing papers and accruing references
>to their work as a means of creating authority
>perspectives.
>
>We just need schemas and running code for semiotes.
>
>len
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]
>
>Good. That's what I'm looking for.


-- 
Rex Brooks
Starbourne Communications Design
1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA 94702 *510-849-2309
http://www.starbourne.com * rexb@starbourne.com