[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [huml-comment] Request for a motion on PC-33 -Section 4.4.6-r ace
From: Ranjeeth Kumar Thunga [mailto:rkthunga@interposting.com]I am casting my own vote to yes, remove the term "race" from physicalDescriptor--based on the posts, it really isn't a specific description of a physical characteristic, but the result of a derivation of other characteristics. It certainly has predefined codelists in existence, but there isn't a universally accepted definition, so it might as well be best be derived from the primary, which would obligate it to be explicitly defined.It feel it think it does belong in the PBS however, which is why I hesitated. However, that doesn't mean that race is also a primary, primordial, fundamental personal identity we would like to often communicate. It isn't necessary a cultural characteristic, but a means of personal identity that is at the core of how many of us define ourselves. To be able to communicate or embody the "black experience living in America" for example really is experience not about culture or any specific physical description, but something transcendent. In the ideal world, possibly we wouldn't define our core self based on our race, but that is how we communicate, and a concept we would want to communicate, now.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC