humanmarkup message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: [humanmarkup] PBS-Doc-kinesic
- From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>
- To: humanmarkup@lists.oasis-open.org, cognite@zianet.com, clbullar@ingr.com,kurt@kurtcagle.net, mbatsis@netsmart.gr
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:44:12 -0700
Title: PBS-Doc-kinesic
T I guess no one had much to say on this,
and there sure isn't much to do on it, except some wording changes for
consistency and changing it to humlCommAtts.
Subject: [humanmarkup-comment] Base Schema - kinesic
From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>
To: humanmarkup-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
humanmarkup@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:03:17 -0700
Steppin Lively Now....
kinesic is a ComplexType element with
the characteristic of being
abstract and belongs the attribute set
humlIdentifierAtts.
It is described as Human Movements. It
is also described as a
vocabulary of body language used to
protray moods and emotions and
tom emphasize or contradict what is
being said (expressed verbally in
vocalized language--my own addition).
An example is an interview.
This element is also given a content of
sequence as a default.
I think we may want to add a bit of
clarification to what we mean by
vocabulary. I think what we mean is a
set of specific movements we
can call gestures, and which need to be
further described by a
lexicon of gestures, such as
shoulderShrug, headNod, headShake,
handShake, etc. However, I think this
lexicon needs to be in the
Secondary Base Schema and is perhaps
the best example yet for why we
need this division before we get to the
application-area schemata.
Thoughts?
Ciao,
Rex
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC