Re: [humanmarkup] PBS-Voting Version

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

Thanks James,

We're getting close now.

Ciao,
Rex

At 3:25 PM -0600 10/30/02, James Landrum wrote:
>I Vote to approve.
>
>Rex Brooks wrote:
>
>>Hi Everyone,
>>
>>Oops, forgot to attach documents.
>>
>>We decided to vote on the first draft of the Primary Base Schema by 
>>Oct. 31, 2002, so here is the final first draft after proofreading 
>>corrections and after an examination of some considerations Sylvia 
>>asked privately, a few minimal  changes. Since you have not had a 
>>chance to look at the changes, I will list them.  There are only 
>>two and they are very minor
>>
>>I have attached a Word version and the ,xsd file and I have 
>>uploaded an html version to our TC website that you can access at 
>>this url:
>>
>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/humanmarkup/huml-primary-base-1.0/huml-primary-base-1.0.html
>>
>>I will address Sylvia's concerns in a separate post. Please note 
>>that there is a very important consideration at the end of that 
>>post. It is very important that our invited experts and those who 
>>have been given that status recently read that section. We will 
>>have some very important decisions to make in regard to that.
>>
>>I will address more wide-ranging concerns in a third post.
>>
>>1. HumlNameElement changed to HumanNameElement. This was my own 
>>suggestion to relieve any possibility of conflict with our 
>>namespace prefix and the Camel Case Guidelines we are now 
>>following. Sylvia also had a note about this, requesting the same 
>>change for a slightly different reason, but her reason was equally 
>>valid. We mean a Human's Name. However, you should read my answer 
>>to her specific question in the separate post.
>>
>>2. Personality has had Enneagram and Meyers-Briggs removed as 
>>sequenced elements. This was due to a suggestion from Sylvia 
>>requesting other candidates as accepted personality-typing systems, 
>>but rather than go down the path of adding more, I deferred that 
>>work to the Secondary Base Schema.
>>
>>*Note: Many of the more developed complexTypes similarly show 
>>examples, and in the foregoing item it was an addition I made, so 
>>it was a subtraction I felt confident in making. A similar case for 
>>such has been in the strawman all along so I did not feel I should 
>>remove it.
>>
>>Please vote by replying to this email by Oct. 31, 2002. I vote to approve.
>>
>>Ciao,
>>Rex
>>
>
>--
>From the Desk of James E. Landrum III
>Database Manager
>Archaeology Technologies Laboratory (ATL; http://atl.ndsu.edu)
>Digital Archive Network for Anthropology (DANA; http://atl.ndsu.edu/archive)
>North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58105
>Ph: 701-231-7115 (my desk) and ATL 701-231-6434
>FAX: 701-231-1047
>email: james.landrum@ndsu.nodak.edu


-- 
Rex Brooks
Starbourne Communications Design
1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA 94702 *510-849-2309
http://www.starbourne.com * rexb@starbourne.com