[huml] RE: [huml-comment] LMNL toolkit for HumanML

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

Hi All, Thanks, Len,

Here is a pertinent url for AIML. I believe this puppy plays more in 
your in your sandbox, Rob.

http://www.alicebot.org/alice/aiml.html

On a separate topic, I'm also happy to point folks to images and 
animations from the birth of the universe, which I imagine Rob is as 
tickled with as am I, though it hardly offsets the Shuttle Columbia 
tragedy.

http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/topstory/2003/0206mapresults.html


At 12:08 PM -0600 2/15/03, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>Gavin has the chops.  No worries.  I'll be interested
>in his comments on the primary because we've not applied
>it and there may be unanticipated difficulties.  I'll
>be happy to correspond to explain the rationale.
>
>That said, I have zero knowledge of LMNL.
>
>The AIML language should be another research topic
>for us given Vigdor's queries to the Big List for
>VRML.  A rules language for AI coupled to the primary
>types in HumanML could be a very powerful application
>for driving avatars.
>
>len


-- 
Rex Brooks
Starbourne Communications Design
1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA 94702 *510-849-2309
http://www.starbourne.com * rexb@starbourne.com