[humanmarkup] Re: [humanmarkup-comment] Technical vs. PhilosophicalContent

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

At 9:05 PM +0200 10/12/01, Niclas Olofsson wrote:
>Kurt Cagle wrote:
>>  At the risk of being offensive
>
>no offense taken, couldn't find it.
>
>>  (which is not my intent)
>
>dito (and I cut out most of the text in my reply because it was plain
>offensive).
>
>>  this IS a technical specification.
>
>Oh, yes it is. But no more, no less, than anything else we are custom to
>work on. But I am used to working with things from an added value
>perspective. The current added value of HumanML is almost questionable.
>Why, what, where, who, when, why?
>
>What is so good about communication? What is good communication?
>
>>  so I would only counsel patience at this stage.
>
>Not my strongest side, nope.


Me neither.
Rex

>non
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>


-- 
Rex Brooks
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
Email: rexb@starbourne.com
Tel: 510-849-2309
Fax: By Request