huml message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: Has anyone read this? Thoughts? Yes I have one
- From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>
- To: Arryhead@AOL.COM, ARCH-L@listserv.tamu.edu
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 06:58:09 -0800
Title: Re: Has anyone read this? Thoughts? Yes I have
one
Actually, and sorry to burst your bubble, but collective
cognition as measured by a Princeton study during the 9/11 disaster,
clearly exists. What, how, etc, has been studied in a rigorous,
international scientific effort at least since 1998, though empirical
evidence supporting such a theory, or set of theories has been
available since human consciousness arose. Having the means and
methodology to identify and study the phemonoma is recent.
You can find the studies that were developed and published from
data intake on 9/11 by looking though
http://noosphere.princeton.edu/index.html
By documenting and studying this and the rest of the evidence
that has been collected in the last five years, I don't think it
requires a great leap to postulate that archeological evidence will be
found once a clear set of criteria for research into this area is
established.
That said, I'm not especially heartened by the apparent necessity
for accepting this finding. I prefer my own mental landscape as an
isolate, not a component, since it implies a wider scope of personal
responsibility than I find comfortable. However, the possibilities are
equally daunting, since the future is under construction by us now.
Also it validates Pogo once again,
"We have found the enemy and it is us."
Ciao,
Rex
At 6:39 AM -0500 12/11/03, Alan L. Bartholomew wrote:
Cognitive archaeology? Give
me a break! how can one possibly study the thoughts of the
past? Can one study the thoughts of the present? Is their
group cognition in say, American Society? For that matter is
there a 'society' in America? I would say certainly not on all
of the above. And I would also say In reality all
that archaeologists can say for certain is hard data derived from
artifacts. One can theorize until one becomes blue in the face
but those theories will never become law because we just simply do not
know! Nor will we ever know until the Time Machine is invented.
Tis fun to think about but it ain't gonna play in
Pomona....
--
Rex Brooks
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
Email: rexb@starbourne.com
Tel: 510-849-2309
Fax: By Request
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]