huml message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: TC Monthly Meeting Minutes 11-19-03
- From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>
- To: huml@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 07:44:06 -0800
Title: TC Monthly Meeting Minutes
11-19-03
Here are the minutes for last month's
meeting:
November 11, 2003
Teleconference meeting of the OASIS HumanMarkup Technical
Committee.
USA Toll Free Number: 888-576-9014
USA Toll Number: +1-773-756-0201
Roll Call:
Voting Members:
Rex Brooks
Sylvia Candelaria deRam
Ranjeeth Kumar Thunga
Russell Ruggiero
James Landrum III
Minutes taken by TC Secretary Rex Brooks
Meeting convened 12:05 p.m. Eastern Time.
Previous meeting minutes accepted.
This meeting was held on the normally scheduled third Wednesday of the
Month.
We did not have a quorum. As a result, we allowed for a more
free-flowing discussion or brainstorming session than is our usual
practice.
The Secretary apologizes that these minutes are more than a month
late. This was due to the amount of preparation that went into the
presentation and paper on "HumanML in Collaborations" for
the Federal Enterprise Architecture Collaboration Expedition Workshop
#30 on December 9, 2003.
As usual, some of these items were actually discussed in a somewhat
different sequence from this summary.
We began considering old business with event and subcommittee
reports.
James announced that there was a call for papers for the CIDOC CRM SIG
Meeting Workshop, to be held in Heraklion, Greece April 24, 2004. He
said he would be attending, but did not have a topic ready for
developing a paper with the TC, as we did last year for the CIDOC
Symposium. Sylvia, who was co-author and co-presenter with James at
the March 2003 Symposium said she would give it some thought.
Specifically, she mentioned that she would use her work on putting
together the Cognition in Environments Subcommittee as a basis for a
topic on how HumanML could work with CRM, particularly as a goal for
that SC.
James also mentioned that he would be working on "Crosswalks"
between HPCDML and CRM using XML and RDF, concentrating on the work he
is doing to prepare the CIDOC CRM for submission to ISO for approval
as an ISO Standard, which is scheduled to coincide with the timeframe
for the Workshop (please confirm this, James--Secretary). James
indicated that this process usually takes six to nine months which
would project the adoption of the CIDOC CRM as an ISO Standard in Q4
2004. Sylvia mentioned that she thought that her work was heading in a
direction that would specifically be based on CRM using RDF as the
functional structure for defining relationships between concepts and
resources for Cognition and Semiosis, and making use of those
relationships in a tangible way, such as the creation of a working
semiotic processor for cognition and communication.
James then announced that he will be attending CAA - Computer
Applications and Quantitative Methods to Archaeology Conference, to be
held in Prato, Italy, on 13-17 April 2004, and was working on the
abstract for a paper on How HumanML Fits within the Digitization of
Data for Human Anatomy and for the Study of Human Evolution, due
November 30. The theme for this conference is:
"beyond the artifact
digital interpretation of the past"
Russell mentioned that he has not heard from Tony Pizi, but thought
that Mr. Pizi might still be interested and that he was working on
recruiting Christopher Lakey as a collaborator on software development
with specific responsibility for keeping our work within a mainstream
architecture.
Sylvia asked if it would be a good idea to contact Manos about the
upcoming work on RDF and Rex concurred, saying that he would do that.
(Note: this remains to be done as of 12-21-03.) This was also noted as
something that might have a tie in to the CIDOC CRM Workshop, which is
being held in Heraklion, Greece and is centered on the theme of
"Practice of Knowledge Sharing" which is a topic
particularly well-suited to the use of RDF. It could be that we can
use this event as an opportunity to recruit for a more international
membership for our TC work. The tie-in with the 2004 Olympics to be
held in Athens and the history of what we call Western culture having
its intellectual genesis in the so-called "Golden Age" of
Hellenic Civilization in the 5th Century BCE seemed obvious, and it
was suggested that we could use this as a way to focus on the
"Study of What is Human." It could be a keystone for our
work. (Having a spokesperson for this recruiting theme, whose nickname
happens to be "Man" is an interesting
coincidence.)
It was further noted that even if we don't have time to put together a
specific paper to submit for this workshop, we would be well served to
have a professional representative on scene who has good credentials
in the interest domain of knowledge sharing, such as Manos.
Rex brought up the topic of a request for conceptual descriptions of
what constitutes a "peer" as distinct from a
"stakeholder" within the context of what constitutes a valid
"peer review" process. This is a topic under consideration
for developing an XML Schema as a guideline by Owen Ambur, co-chair of
the XML.gov Working Group, and is part of his on-going effort to
develop a standardized process for identifying Emerging Technologies
of interest for the Federal Government's wide variety of agencies and
working units. James offered to send along his thoughts on the subject
since he has served on several peer review committees. His general
assessment was that in his field of Archeology, a recurrent
stakeholder example would be the Archeology Teacher, while a Museum
Curator for Arheological Exhibits or an Archeology Post Dcotoral Field
Researcher represents a peer as someone who has professional
credentials for conducting work "on record" in the field or
domain, so to speak. In this set of examples Peers are Decision Makers
and Stakeholders are Consumers or Beneficiiaries of the work done by
Peers.
Ranjeeth noted that one of our central tenets, Intent, could also be
used to differentiate between stakeholders whose intent is to use a
body of work while peers intend to create or extend the body of
work.
James further noted that, as peers, we need to cite use-case based,
fundamentally concrete, examples for the uses of HPCDML research in
the presentation we were working on for the December 9th Workshop, and
that as an extension of this concept, we should schedule a specific
first subcommittee meeting for the HPCDML SC in January and conduct
our recruiting on the basis of finding individuals working in the
field such as those involved with the Native Dancer project. Rex
concurred.
James mentined that Terri Childs, of nps.gov, the National Parks
Service would be a good contact for coordinating our work with regard
to and for the purposes of supporting the work of protecting and
preserving our National Heritage within the Department of the
Interior, which also happens to be the federal cabinet department
within which Owen Ambur works.
A particular project which could be a candidate area for study within
HPCDML would be accessibility, such as maps for the blind, and closed
captioning for the hearing impaired.
It was noticed at this point that we have actually run over our usual
time limit, so we adjourned at 2:25 p.m. Eastern Time.
--
Rex Brooks
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
Email: rexb@starbourne.com
Tel: 510-849-2309
Fax: By Request
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]