[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Promotion/marketing
Greetings! Possibly something, maybe nothing but a theme for promoting/marketing ICOM occurred to me and I wanted to toss it out for discussion. ICOM: An Uncommon/Common Model All semantic integration solutions rely on either ETL (extract-transform-load) or VA (view-as) to arrive at a common model for data. But arriving at a common model, while a first step towards semantic integration, is only the first step. Security: Imagine your reaction to a health club where you were told to put all your wallet, iPhone, watch, Blackberry and your clothes into a common box with everyone else's wallets, iPhones, watches, and Blackberries. A common model to be sure but not a very secure one. ICOM is an Uncommon/Common model because granular security is layered onto the common models that make up ICOM, enabling you to insure that integrated data collections conform to your corporate security policies. Private/Proprietary/Public: For semantic integration you can: Develop private models, which means your staff has to maintain and learn your model. You are unable to hire staff who have existing skills for your model. Use proprietary models, which means you can hire staff with existing skills, but ties your semantic integration fate to that of a third-party vendor. ICOM is an Uncommon/Common model that was developed and is being maintained in a public forum. You can have a direct voice in the governance of the model for your semantic integration efforts. ICOM means you can hire staff with existing skills and have a voice in the model for your data. Standard: There are formal standards, of which ICOM is one but there are also defacto standards, and ICOM is one of those as well. (This point may need to be deferred until we have several large vendors supporting ICOM.) In addition to being an OASIS standard, ICOM appears in products from (list here the vendors who are the backbone of the Internet), making it a defacto standard for semantic integration. ****** Obviously need refinement but thinking that tying those three points together with illustrations from the model, (limited illustrations, not every capability), would make a start on promoting ICOM to a larger audience. I suspect security and a *voice* in model development is likely to resonate with government and other players. Hope everyone is having a great week! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net Homepage: http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]