[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ICOM-15) 30-Day Public Review Comment 7

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ICOM-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=31083#action_31083 ] 

Patrick Durusau commented on ICOM-15:
-------------------------------------

Accept. 

What is being described are two different ways to conform to the standard. Need to seperate so applications can indicate which type of conformance is being provided. As written, could be section 3 or section 4. Easiest to re-cast section 5 to break out different types of conformance into subsections.

> 30-Day Public Review Comment 7
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ICOM-15
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ICOM-15
>             Project: OASIS Integrated Collaboration Object Model for Interoperable Collaboration  Services (ICOM) TC 
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Eric Chan
>            Assignee: Patrick Durusau
>
> [Comment 7] : Section 5 Conformance: The first 2 points in the numbered list (1,2) look like a cut-and-paste gone wrong: should really 
> "Service provider role" be repeated twice here?
> 1. Service provider role: An ICOM service provider shall conform to all mandatory and optional ... Section 3
> 2. Service provider role: An ICOM service provider shall conform to all mandatory and optional ... Section 4
> I would advise to more clearly separate the requirements for each type of role, into separate Conformance Clauses.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira