Re: [ihc] Use cases

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

Title: Re: [ihc] Use cases

Thanks, Brett,

I approve of using UML. I prefer Rational for the purpose, and wasn't aware that Visio had that capability. I think I will attempt to see if IBM could be interested in working with this TC to the extent of perhaps arranging a way to provide a staff member to the TC with the ability to keep the UML in Rational as well. That way we keep the J2EE domain covered as well as the .Net world. I work with both and do my best to keep things up to date in parallel.

Ciao,

Rex

At 5:54 PM -0700 10/25/04, Brett Trusko wrote:

>  
> All,
> In the
> grand scheme of things, would we be best off focusing first on use
> cases in the healthcare continuum? After thinking through the process,
> I believe that this is where we could make the greatest impact the
> soonest.
> If so,
> what is the best tool we could use in the development of use cases? I
> have a use case UML tool in Visio 2003, but am sure that many do not
> have Visio, not to mention the 2003 version. Accordingly, I would be
> willing to be the "keeper" of the use cases if the members of the
> committee would be willing to start to feed the "actors" to me. My
> assumption is that we could start to build from use case and become
> more sophisticated as we build the picture.
> Sooooo
> . . . Any thoughts, comments etc. on this?
> Send
> me your actors . . .
> Brett
> Brett
> Trusko, Ph.D.
> OASIS
> 10
> Stratford Court
> Danville, CA   94506
> Brett.trusko@oasis-open.org
> (925)
> 683-2974
> "send me your actors . . ."

-- 

Rex Brooks
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
Email: rexb@starbourne.com

Tel: 510-849-2309

Fax: By Request