RE: Proposed claim encoding profile for SAML 1.1 tokens

[Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>]

I think there are a few problems, as it does not explicitly state that the “\” at the end is required. Also the language is too laxed for interoperability, this seems to be caused by the desire to have some level of co-existence with the SAML 2.0 profile, which may not be the best thing to do

 

From: Mike Jones [mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 8:07 AM
To: imi@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [imi] Proposed claim encoding profile for SAML 1.1 tokens

 

I’ve run the attached proposed claim encoding profile for SAML 1.1 tokens by John and Drummond, as well as Paul Trevithick.  I believe it does what we need (while still being a one-pager).  It’s intended to maximize interoperability.

 

This issue is tracked as IMI-23.

 

                                                                                -- Mike